Discussion about this post

User's avatar
WTM's avatar
Jul 16Edited

It's going to be interesting to see what happens with these college pitchers over time. Without going back and examining Huntington's drafts to corroborate my memory, I think there's a distinct difference with this FO, basically in looking for more upside.

My memory of NH's college pitchers (and a direct comparison is hampered by the fact that NH went more heavily for prep pitchers) is that he had a distinct template: 6'4" RHPs who threw sinkers (or were going to whether they wanted or not), had one breaking ball (if a draftee threw two, the Pirates would have him scrap one -- even did that to Shane Baz), and were absolutely by damn going to throw a change. The result was a lot of guys who made it to the upper minors and mostly topped out there.

This FO is more flexible. Some guys throw sinkers, but a lot of their lower level pitchers throw up in the zone, even guys with middling velocity. Not everybody throws a change and lots throw multiple breaking balls. Lots of cutters (used to drive me nuts that almost nobody threw that under NH) and even some splitters.

And there's definitely a focus on searching under rocks. Another TJ guy, for instance. And guys with control problems. (That doesn't necessarily work out -- see Kennedy, Tyler.) And guys whose stuff mysteriously regressed.

No idea whether any of this will work. They've had good returns from a number of guys the last couple years, but almost nobody is at Altoona yet and, imo, MiL #s from college draftees are meaningless below AA. But I like the approach better than NH's.

Expand full comment
WTM's avatar
Jul 16Edited

Nobody seems to be taking overslot guys.

Really looks to me like they should cut the draft back to 15 rounds, maybe 12. Teams can sign 8-10 NDFAs instead of 2-3.

Expand full comment
109 more comments...

No posts